After Further Review, At Least 15 Years of Gas in the Marcellus Shale

After publishing the piece about Terry Engelder's update on the Marcellus reserve estimate, I made an inquiry to confirm my assumption about the new estimate of recoverable gas in the play. To clarify, Professor Engelder notes that the new analysis is derived from a convergence of the latest data provided by Chesapeake, Range and several other operators. He provided the following assumptions used in his analysis:

Total Acreage 31,000,000
# Sections (640 acre) = 48,437.5
GIP/Section = 75 bcf
Total Gas in Place = 3,632 tcf
Recovery Factor = 30%
Technically Recoverable Gas = 1,089 tcf

Professor Engelder cautioned that a practical assessment of the amount of gas which could be expected to be recovered would need to consider how much of the acreage is accessible. There are, of course properties that cannot be developed, existing storage fields, terrain challenged areas, etc., which must be discounted. In his present assumption, 33.33% of the total acreage in the play can be considered developable. This would leave the truly recoverable reserves at 363 tcf, a sevenfold increase of the prior 50 tcf estimate and much greater than the double I reported earlier.

Under these assumptions, the Marcellus could now provide all of the natural gas consumed in the US for 15 years.

Atlas Energy Resources Provides Update

Atlas provided an update on its Marcellus shale program with news of an accelerated horizontal drilling program and a remarkable IP rate from a vertcal well in Fayette County, PA, of 3.6 mmcf/day, The company also laid claim to the title of the largest producer in the Marcellus as it surpasses 4 bcf of cumulative production.
Full Story

Marcellus Potential Doubled

Yesterday, according to the attached report of his talk at the Platts Appalachian Gas conference in Pittsburgh, Terry Engelder, Professor of Geoscience at Penn State, doubled his estimate of Marcellus GIP to 1,100 tcf. Last January, the professor surprised the natural gas industry with his upside estimate of 516 tcf. I believe the article incorrectly states that his estimate of recoverable gas is now over 1 tcf. It should actually read over 100 tcf; also, a double from his earlier 50 tcf estimate.

Full Story

Drillbits

It Matters Hardly at All

As Chesapeake Energy seeks to shore up its cash position by taking on a JV partner for its Marcellus shale, a strange, but true back story may be hurting the company's chances. The consummate land man, Aubrey McClendon, might just have outdone himself.

The company’s latest investor presentation gives an implied value of $7,500/acre for its 1.8 mm acres of Marcellus leasehold (US $13.5B). So, a 25% share would be worth $3.4B. On the basis of the previous JV deals, a portion of this amount would be in cash with the balance delivered over time in the form of a drilling cost carry. According to the presentation’s tables, these JV proceeds combined with the proceeds from sales of some producing properties in Oklahoma and South Texas are projected to raise $2.5B to $3.0B. So, $1.7B from the Marcellus would seem reasonable and, thus, a critical piece of the 12/31/08 Ending Cash forecast of $3.5B.

But, there’s a problem. While advocating a lease acquisition and monetization strategy of buy low, sell high, Mr. McClendon noted:

“One of the great advantages of a time like this is we can drive down the cost of our business. That’s not only going to be true soon on the drilling side but it’s especially true today on the leasing side as we are continuing to be very, very aggressive in driving down prices in areas of shale plays so we can acquire leases we think at a lower price going forward.” …..“I can assure you that buying leases for X and selling them for 5X or 10X is a lot more profitable than trying to produce gas at $5 or $6/mcf.”

Now, that’s all well and good, if, as Chairman/CEO of the largest US gas producer, you can somehow profit by professing your abilities as a land man. Call me crazy, but I’d think the best way to profit by buying and selling leases is to keep lease prices in a play high until you sell them, not knock them down while you're still trying. Then, you could tout them by saying, as Mr. McClendon did:

“The neat thing is leasehold is always cheap in a play whether you pay $5,000 an acre or $10,000 or $20,000 or $30,000. In most of these shale plays it matters hardly at all as to what you pay for leasehold because you consume so much leasehold at 80 acres generally a well and these wells can cost $3 million to $6.5 million. So you put some leasehold on top of that, it’s just not much money at the end of the day.”

Instead, what Chesapeake has done in the Marcellus is to be “very, very aggressive in driving down prices”, by effectively pulling out of leasing completely. First in NEPA, then in SWPA, then Range followed suit….then a few smaller operators, then Chief and last week, Marathon. Prices have plummeted to $500 to $2,000/acre, and so have Chesapeake’s chances of doing a JV deal by year end.

More likely is another kind of deal; a deal following a Not Done or Failure to Deliver on the JV; a kind of Bear or Wachovia deal when someone deciding to commit $3.4B for a 25% share of the Marcellus realizes that the entire market cap of Chesapeake is only $10B. And that, if they hold up on the JV, they just might get the whole company for the same number.

Unfortunately, for Aubrey, since getting hit with those margin calls, his vote on the motion………why, it matters hardly at all.

October 15, Business Update Call Transcript